Red Cross Finds Detainee Abuse in Guantánamo
Published: November 30, 2004
(Page 3 of 3) The
Pentagon also said the medical care given detainees was first-rate.
Although the Red Cross criticized the lack of confidentiality, it
agreed in the report that the medical care was of high quality. Leonard
S. Rubenstein, the executive director of Physicians for Human Rights,
was asked to comment on the account of the Red Cross report, and said,
"The use of medical personnel to facilitate abusive interrogations
places them in an untenable position and violates international ethical
standards." Mr. Rubenstein added, "We need to know more about
these practices, including whether health professionals engaged in
calibrating levels of pain inflicted on detainees." The issue of whether torture at Guantánamo was condoned or encouraged has been a problem before for the Bush administration. In February 2002, President
Bush ordered that the prisoners at Guantánamo be treated "humanely and,
to the extent appropriate with military necessity, in a manner
consistent with" the Geneva Conventions. That statement masked a
roiling legal discussion within the administration as government
lawyers wrote a series of memorandums, many of which seemed to justify
harsh and coercive treatment. A month after Mr. Bush's
public statement, a team of administration lawyers accepted a view
first advocated by the Justice Department that the president had wide
powers in authorizing coercive treatment of detainees. The legal team
in a memorandum concluded that Mr. Bush was not bound by either the
international Convention Against Torture or a federal antitorture
statute because he had the authority to protect the nation from
terrorism. That document provides tightly constructed definitions
of torture. For example, if an interrogator "knows that severe pain
will result from his actions, if causing such harm is not his
objective, he lacks the requisite specific intent even though the
defendant did not act in good faith," it said. "Instead, a defendant is
guilty of torture only if he acts with the express purpose of
inflicting severe pain or suffering on a person within his control." When
some administration memorandums about coercive treatment or torture
were disclosed, the White House said they were only advisory. Last
month, military guards, intelligence agents and others described in
interviews with The Times a range of procedures that they said were
highly abusive occurring over a long period, as well as rewards for
prisoners who cooperated with interrogators. The people who worked at
Camp Delta, the main prison facility, said that one regular procedure
was making uncooperative prisoners strip to their underwear, having
them sit in a chair while shackled hand and foot to a bolt in the
floor, and forcing them to endure strobe lights and loud rock and rap
music played through two close loudspeakers, while the air-conditioning
was turned up to maximum levels. Some accounts of techniques at
Guantánamo have been easy to dismiss because they seemed so
implausible. The most striking of the accusations, which have come
mainly from a group of detainees released to their native Britain, has
been that the military used prostitutes who made coarse comments and
come-ons to taunt some prisoners who are Muslims. But the Red
Cross report hints strongly at an explanation of some of those
accusations by stating that there were frequent complaints by prisoners
in 2003 that some of the female interrogators baited their subjects
with sexual overtures. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, who commanded the
detention and intelligence operation at Guantánamo until April, when he
took over prison operations in Iraq, said in an interview early this
year about general interrogation procedures that the female
interrogators had proved to be among the most effective. General
Miller's observation matches common wisdom among experienced
intelligence officers that women may be effective as interrogators when
seen by their subjects as mothers or sisters. Sexual taunting does not,
however, comport with what is often referred to as the "mother-sister
syndrome." But the Red Cross report said that complaints about
the practice of sexual taunting stopped in the last year. Guantánamo
officials have acknowledged that they have improved their techniques
and that some earlier methods they tried proved to be ineffective,
raising the possibility that the sexual taunting was an experiment that
was abandoned.
|