(2 points) Tautologous:
P | P -> P ---------- T | T T T F | F T F
(2 points) Inconsistent:
P Q | (P v - Q) & -(- P -> - Q) ------------------------------- T T | T T F T F F F T T F T T F | T T T F F F F T T T F F T | F F F T F T T F F F T F F | F T T F F F T F T T F
(2 points) Contingent:
P Q R | (P & Q -> R) -> (P -> R) & (Q -> R) ------------------------------------------- T T T | T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T F | T T T F F T T F F F T F F T F T | T F F T T T T T T T F T T T F F | T F F T F F T F F F F T F F T T | F F T T T T F T T T T T T F T F | F F T T F F F T F F T F F F F T | F F F T T T F T T T F T T F F F | F F F T F T F T F T F T F
(2 points) For the conclusion to be false, P must be true and R must be false. If R is false, then the only way the assumption P & Q -> R can be true is if the antecedent P & Q is also false; since P is true, this must mean that Q is false:
P Q R | P & Q -> R | P -> R --------------------------- T F F | T F F T F | T F F
(2 points) As above, Q must be true and R false; if the assumptions are all to be true, then this forces P to be false as well:
P Q R | P -> Q | P -> R | Q -> R -------------------------------- F T F | F T T | F T F | T F F
(2 points) The conclusion is just P, so that has to be false; the assumptions will all be true if Q is true and R is false:
P Q R | P -> (Q -> R) | Q | - R | P ----------------------------------- F T F | F T T F F | T | T F | F